We are, All of Us,
Ring Bearers
#86,
February 06, 2002
Tolkien's
"The Lord of the Rings" was, for me, not a book but an experience. I
read it for the first time during my last year of college, my first year with
my future wife. I remember a misty night on the Oregon coast, reading the first
part of the trilogy, "The Fellowship of the Ring," out loud by
candlelight in our zipped-together sleeping bags, stopping every few minutes to
listen for the hooves of the Black Riders. Later that summer, I read in the
Sierras, watching the alpenglow fade from the razor ridges of the Emyn Muil as
my friends Legolas Henry and Gimli Hughes pitched our tent. Our trail went on
and on . . .
Twenty-five
years later, I started all over, this time in the lower level of my young son's
bunk bed. We attached a map of Middle Earth to the bottom of the upper bunk -
thus we could follow our friends and heroes as they traveled from Bywater to
Bree, from Rivendell to Rauros. Every day, for half a year, we looked forward
to our nightly adventure.
So
I came to Peter Jackson's film version of this great story with considerable
history, and high hopes. And I was not disappointed. (Warning to those of you who
want story secrets to remain secret: if you have not read all three volumes of
the Trilogy, put this column aside until you have. And read at least
"Fellowship" before you view; it makes for a better reading and
viewing experience.)
The
film worked for me at every level. It was a visual masterpiece: the sets,
costumes, make up, effects, and cinematography were as rich as Tolkien's verbal
portrait. Jackson's direction gave it sense of motion that drew you into the
story, put you in these places. The casting was impeccable, especially Ian
McKellen as the multifaceted Gandalf and Elijah Wood as the beleaguered Frodo.
I
had a tough time at first not seeing Hugo Weaving's Elrond as an elven version
of Matrix Agent Smith, but this casting choice gave Elrond the kind of scary
strength you need to be a warrior of his stature and not just some wussy wise
man.
The
acting? After several viewings, it more than held up. McKellen and Wood are
Oscar material, but everyone contributed to the authenticity and depth of the
tale. Viggo Mortensen's Strider-becomes-Aragorn and Sean Bean's tragic Boromir
offer a thought-provoking study of men discovering their strengths and
weaknesses, bound in a web of fate.
Jackson
was wise to leave so much of Tolkien's story intact, but he wasn't afraid to
add his creative touch. I found most fascinating his treatment of the demise of
Gandalf in the Mines of Moria. (Warning: stop here if you haven't read
"The Two Towers!")
In
the book, a battle-weary Gandalf is pulled into the chasm by a thong of the
Balrog's fiery whip. But in the film, a still-strong Gandalf clearly lets go.
And it makes sense. Gandalf realizes, after getting whupped by Saruman, that he
needs to spend some time "in the gym" with the Balrog. It's a big
risk, but if he emerges, he will have the power he needs to ensure the success
of the Fellowship. Also, his "dropping out" at this point forces
Strider into the leadership role he must take if . . . well, you know the
story.
My
favorite moment is when Frodo decides to embark for Mordor. He stands on the
riverbank, ring in hand. His self-pitying instincts plead for retreat. But he
draws on some inner strength, what Gandalf recognized as that force for good
that is moving in the world. And with this strength, he closes his hand around
the ring, and seals his fate as the ring bearer.
Tolkien's
story is more than escapist fantasy. Frodo's journey is the mythical hero's
journey, one we all face. We'd all like to have been born to a time when evil
was not ascendant in the world. But, like Frodo, we can only choose how to make
best use of the time we have. We are all ring bearers.