Leadership that
delivers Lafferty
#94, May 29, 2002
Late
last month, our supervisor, Mike Kerns, joined by Supervisors Paul Kelly and
Tim Smith, rejected the city of Petaluma's application for Open Space District
funding to help open Lafferty Park. I'm trying to figure out why - especially
for Supervisor Kerns, who earlier claimed to support the city.
In
the Argus' June 5 story, Kerns said the OSD staff report influenced his
"somewhat of a change of mind." The report reads like other county
staff reports on Lafferty, where the staff was under pressure to support
foregone political conclusions. For instance: ". . . the city makes it
clear . . . that the city has no available funds to pursue this project
further. This representation poses difficulty to the district to authorize
funding to support the city's goal for developing a park at this time." In
other words, we can't give you money to open Lafferty Park because you need
money to open Lafferty Park. Kerns didn't question this "Catch 22"
rationale.
Another
concern, expressed by Peter Pfendler's attorney, echoed by Kerns and Smith, was
the application's consistency with the district's expenditure plan. More back
room monkey business: In August 1997, a senior county bureaucrat, overriding
June 1997 and October 1995 written opinions from his department, claimed
Lafferty was not consistent with the county General Plan. Why? Lafferty was not
a park, he said, but merely a trail, because it didn't have picnic benches or
play equipment. We sent Kerns a detailed rebuttal to this claim two weeks
before the hearing, but he didn't use it.
Staff
also questioned whether Lafferty was threatened with development. Kerns said
the clinching argument was the government code requiring the city to offer the
property to the OSD before it could sell it to a developer. Think about what
he's saying: we're not allowed to buy development rights today for $1 million,
which would enable opening Lafferty Park, because we could buy the property in
fee for $5 million when the city finally gives up on Lafferty Park. Did he
think this through?
The
most significant issue raised by staff was the threat of litigation, especially
if the city used OSD money for eminent domain proceedings to clear the spurious
ownership claims that Pfendler and Al Bettman have made on the patch of
shoulder at the Lafferty gate. To reduce the risk of this litigation threat
from the neighbors, city officials offered that the city would stipulate to not
spend funds on eminent domain. In explaining his vote, Kerns didn't even
acknowledge this offer to compromise.
Several
people who spoke, including Supervisor Mike Reilly, pointed out that litigation
threats should not dictate OSD policy (it's like the police refusing to rescue
a kidnapped child because the police might get hurt). Even if it took a full
million dollars of OSD money to successfully defend Petaluma's EIR and right of
way, that would result in a long-planned, much-needed spectacular park for
perhaps a fifth of what the OSD would pay per acre for another property, IF
they could find one. Kerns didn't respond to these points.
Kerns
suggested the city re-apply under the matching grants program. There are
several problems with this. The city would have to clear up the right of way
issue before it saw any OSD money, and that could be the most significant expense
facing the city, enough to stop the show. It would also allow the county and
Pfendler to put more strings on the project (like limiting use to docent-led
tours.) And, it just adds more delay, more city staff and volunteer effort,
more places for Pfendler's lawyers to set their hooks.
I'm
disappointed in Mike Kerns. It appeared he had his mind made up before any of
the several dozen Lafferty Park supporters spoke, that he had developed a
rationale for voting it down without triggering public outrage.
Mike
Kerns can still choose. Will it be private preserves in a gated community? Or a
mountain park for everyone? He can put his stamp prominently on something that
will stand for centuries, if he exercises leadership, and delivers. Help
convince him. Call him at 565-2241. And join us on this month's Walk to the
Park, June 16 (see www.laffertypark.org.)